Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Green Lantern Corps #10 *Preview/Spoilers*
Collapse
X
-
Were I Stewart, I would ask the Alphas: "If a similar circumstance arose again where a Lantern is about to reveal the location of Oa, or other secrets of similar scale, what would you want a fellow Lantern do?"
I doubt the Alphas could answer that, because protecting the Corps (especially the rules) is very much their focus, they can't openly tell other Lanterns not to do their best to protect Oa, neither can they tell other Lanterns to do what Stewart do since such action would be punished by death.
In short, the Alphas punished Stewart based on his crime of murdering a comrade but they themselves probably don't have a good answer to "what else could a Lantern do in that situation.":Gray Lantern the True Neutral:
Cyberium of Sector 614, you foresee great HOPE in our future.
-
The Alphas could NEVER be in that situation. Their rings are always fully charged thanks to the battery embedded in their chests. They could have always taken him alive.
But, like I said before ... they could have made Stewart's choice more ambiguous for the readers. Making an issue about his ring being charged, pointing out that he kileld Mogo, that he killd Old Timer (old continuity, but you take what you get), that he failed to save Xanshi ... most of these things would be unfair and out of context, but it'd provide plenty to make a believable case for excecuting John. I really hate that the only case here is "OMG he killed that one GL." They could have made a much more ambiguous position for John, as this really ought to be. We don't need to be spoonfed his innoncence here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gauntlet101010 View PostThe Alphas could NEVER be in that situation. Their rings are always fully charged thanks to the battery embedded in their chests. They could have always taken him alive.
Originally posted by Gauntlet101010 View PostBut, like I said before ... they could have made Stewart's choice more ambiguous for the readers. Making an issue about his ring being charged, pointing out that he kileld Mogo, that he killd Old Timer (old continuity, but you take what you get), that he failed to save Xanshi ... most of these things would be unfair and out of context, but it'd provide plenty to make a believable case for excecuting John. I really hate that the only case here is "OMG he killed that one GL." They could have made a much more ambiguous position for John, as this really ought to be. We don't need to be spoonfed his innoncence here.:Gray Lantern the True Neutral:
Cyberium of Sector 614, you foresee great HOPE in our future.
Comment
-
i am REALLY liking GLC
post# 14,400Last edited by IonFan; 06-17-2012, 04:04 AM.
IonFan says
MAGA then, MAGA now, MAGA FOREVER
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cyberium View PostThose past events might instead help Stewart's position. Killing Mogo, for one, was an unfortunate requirement in defeating Krona, and while Xanshi's incident was a failure it doesn't warrant punishment. Since Alphas are the only ones who have access to the data (if Salaak knows, he didn't tell), the less they tell the more convincing it would be. Still, the case is fail on Alpha's side because people never liked the Alphas and John had a good enough case/reputation to earn empathy.
These are solid points the Alphas could have made seeing as the Alphas are dicks. Outside of the situation it really looks terrible. Killing TWO fellow GLs in a matter of months (weeks?), killing a Guardian (never mind that he was mad), destroying Xanshi (again, never mind that he didn't really). Hell, if we still had our continuity we could say that he can't be trusted because he worked for the Controllers in their Darkstar program.
I guess my point is, Tomasi was lazy in his argument against John with just the ONE point and even cutting out the context to show us that the Alphas were wrong and John was right ... and I was disappointed in that. It could have been better. In regards to Kirrt's death, we could actually have had a real discussion on whether it was the right thing to do since John escaped right after. I think the Alphas could have found him guilty even without the evidence tampering.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gauntlet101010 View PostI guess my point is, Tomasi was lazy in his argument against John with just the ONE point and even cutting out the context to show us that the Alphas were wrong and John was right ... and I was disappointed in that. It could have been better. In regards to Kirrt's death, we could actually have had a real discussion on whether it was the right thing to do since John escaped right after. I think the Alphas could have found him guilty even without the evidence tampering.:Gray Lantern the True Neutral:
Cyberium of Sector 614, you foresee great HOPE in our future.
Comment
-
Awesome preview! GLC has really picked up, I can't wait to see what the GLs do to try and save John.No Sir, I punched the viceroy in the stomach, then I headbutted him in the face. Sir.-Hal Jordan
Villain Draft (Best Team Winner)/Proud Supporter of the DCnU
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gauntlet101010 View Post...I guess my point is, Tomasi was lazy in his argument against John with just the ONE point and even cutting out the context to show us that the Alphas were wrong and John was right ... and I was disappointed in that. It could have been better. In regards to Kirrt's death, we could actually have had a real discussion on whether it was the right thing to do since John escaped right after. I think the Alphas could have found him guilty even without the evidence tampering.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnMc View PostI wonder if they're going to go with the cliche'd "The Alphas are being controlled somehow" bit again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Ed View PostI think I'd rather that than have the Alphas conveniently act as a plot device to further the Guardian's nefarious ends out of sheer coincidence. Their sentence is so out of left field given the circumstances that for them to have arrived there WITHOUT outside influence is simply stupid.
Comment
Comment