Jerks, yes, but NEVER evil. And by the end of the Ion storyarc, when Kyle "resurrected" them...they were children so they could learn to temper their actions with lifelong experience instead of being jerks. (Something else Johns conveniently ignored.)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Green Lantern #14 *Preview/Spoilers*
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gauntlet101010 View PostCan't help but disagree. I'm reminded when they decided it'd be a fantastic idea to program the CPB to explode is a Krugerian ever suffered death at their hands or the hands of the GLC ... and then left without telling anyone.
Or their how they hid the truth that touching Krona's servants in that "third law" story would shorten the lives of the GLs who fought against them (Ganthet went against their wishes and told the GLC this, the other Guardians were fine letting it happen).
Or how they let Jhon charge on the newly reconstructed CPB in Vol 3, seemingly knowing that would free Sinestro's spirit (didn't read Mosaic, but they kinda jerked him around in that Vol 3 story).
There's a lot of times where they were kind of jerks.
Comment
-
But I am saying that it isn't that big of a leap from insesnitive and out of touch to being evil.
I bring up that last story to point out that the Guardians aren't always wise. The story point is absurd ... and it makes the Guardians seem immensely foolish. So, even when they are written as benevolent, they do foolish things at times.
It's not that they were evil for witholding information during the third law arc ..... but it isn't too far from it. Didn't read all of Mosaic, but again, they didn't play it straight with John during that first arc in Vol. 3. Again, not exactly evil but it's not a large leap from the guys who put Jhon where they wanted him to become evil.
To me, being detached and calculating isn't a far leap from being evil. Yes, Johns' take is a departure from the benevelent, but detached Guardians ... but it's not a total leap in logic either. If you get detached enough good and evil just look like words. That's where the Guardians are now.Last edited by Gauntlet101010; 11-08-2012, 10:59 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gauntlet101010 View PostBut I am saying that it isn't that big of a leap from insesnitive and out of touch to being evil.
I bring up that last story to point out that the Guardians aren't always wise. The story point is absurd ... and it makes the Guardians seem immensely foolish. So, even when they are written as benevolent, they do foolish things at times.
It's not that they were evil for witholding information during the third law arc ..... but it isn't too far from it. Didn't read all of Mosaic, but again, they didn't play it straight with John during that first arc in Vol. 3. Again, not exactly evil but it's not a large leap from the guys who put Jhon where they wanted him to become evil.
To me, being detached and calculating isn't a far leap from being evil. Yes, Johns' take is a departure from the benevelent, but detached Guardians ... but it's not a total leap in logic either. If you get detached enough good and evil just look like words. That's where the Guardians are now.)
Comment
-
Loved this issue! And not because of Baz, but because of everyone else. It was cool seeing more of the first lantern, Black Hand, and the other guardians. I also loved the JL in this, I liked how they didn't just attack Baz and it was nice to see Flash have a bigger role than in the JL book. Oh and I'm glad that we are finally starting to see more of Hal and Sinestro, and hopefully they can atleast get a full page all to themselves next issue.
Comment
-
His sister planted the bomb.
She's the terrorist. (Remember she was in all those scenes too where they were bullied/judged/harassed through time.)
The address she gave him is an ambush waiting...others wanting to get ahold of that ring as a weapon for their cause.
Hero betrayed by the one he trusts the most, she ends up dying somehow right after the truth is revealed - the manifestation of his conscience turning out to not be everything he projected onto her after all...there's his origin tragedy.GuestLast edited by Guest; 11-09-2012, 03:27 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tandaemonium View PostHis sister planted the bomb.
She's the terrorist. (Remember she was in all those scenes too where they were bullied/judged/harassed through time.)
The address she gave him is an ambush waiting...others wanting to get ahold of that ring as a weapon for their cause.
Hero betrayed by the one he trusts the most, she ends up dying somehow right after the truth is revealed - the manifestation of his conscience turning out to not be everything he projected onto her after all...there's his origin tragedy.No Sir, I punched the viceroy in the stomach, then I headbutted him in the face. Sir.-Hal Jordan
Villain Draft (Best Team Winner)/Proud Supporter of the DCnU
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tandaemonium View PostHis sister planted the bomb.
She's the terrorist. (Remember she was in all those scenes too where they were bullied/judged/harassed through time.)
The address she gave him is an ambush waiting...others wanting to get ahold of that ring as a weapon for their cause.
Hero betrayed by the one he trusts the most, she ends up dying somehow right after the truth is revealed - the manifestation of his conscience turning out to not be everything he projected onto her after all...there's his origin tragedy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnMc View Post"I hope it was Gardner" Real classy Geoff. Tell us again how much you "love" Guy.
Comment
-
I kinda wished it was Batman who had said it.I LOVE conspiracy theorists. They are like human versions of the cymbal clapping, dancing monkeys. No one takes them all that seriously and they get bored with them after about 10 minutes.
Comment
Comment