Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Green Lantern Movie News Discussion Thread
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by Dr. Naysay View PostThat's because in the the old days there was at least some effort to have shit make sense.
(True, if they set up monuments for EVERY fallen GL, after a few billion years that's gonna take up a lot of space.)
(Also, I suppose the views we have had of Oa aren't clear enough to say that it IS a PLANET-WIDE city, but it sure looks like far more of the surface is in use than would be explained by a couple dozen inhabitants, a few thousand sometime visitors, and even a LARGE prison population.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Cormier View PostThey have to do something to decorate the place. In the old days, Oa was drawn like Tattooine with a couple of yellow building clustered together in one spot. Pretty bland, and I'm all for them jazzing up the place in the comics AND the movie.
Of course, many Geoff-cons later, that's all changed now.Originally posted by Jeffi.Kaiser View PostMy opinion on the small robot looking things. Ive always pondered who did the day to day runnings on Oa. You know maintaining the buildings, cooking the food, all that stuff. I couldnt see hardened GL's wanting to do that, so Ive always figured the Guardians hired volunteers to do those things. Maybe those things are shuttles to transport workers on Oa?
If they won't trust robots to wield the green light to defend the universe (with the exception of Stel and maybe a couple of others that have proven themselves worthy,) why would they want to have a bunch of droids floating around all over the place? Remember that the Green Lantern Corps, comprised of SENTIENT, ORGANIC LIFEFORMS was created BECAUSE the machine men known as the Manhunters had proven themselves untrustworthy. And we know the Manhunters are meant to exist in the movie continuity, because the video game that ties into the movie is all about the Manhunters returning to cause trouble!
And besides, when you wield the emerald energy of willpower, why do you have to have ANYONE do anything for you? You can do anything you want, anytime, as quickly as you can THINK IT. And as comic readers have known for decades, no one's more adept at wielding the emerald energy than the Guardians of the Universe! They don't patrol the universe themselves, they delegate that responsibility to the Corps. And they've got to do SOMETHING with their time. Might as well use their powers to clean up after themselves and their Corps... unless you think they just sit around watching porn on the interwebz all day!Originally posted by havik View Postgreat means i wont even find tickets at my local theatre until about july
Comment
-
I don't think the Manhunter problem would necessarily sour them on all robotic tech. I mean, if it isn't sentient, and it doesn't have access to the Green Energy, what's the big deal?
And I can totally see them being "above" any menial tasks, even if performed with GL energy. Their attention would be reserved for other, more important things.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Ed View PostI realized after I posted that that was a possible interpretation of what he said. I'm just so used to people thinking Red, Yellow, and Blue are THE primary colors (which isn't strictly accurate for pigments either, but close enough) that I overlooked that possibility initially.
If you think about it, most superhero costumes are made from primary colors (along with black, white and gray) - Superman, Spider-Man, Wonder Woman, Batman, Iron Man, Captain America, Flash, Thor, Captain Marvel... well, you get the idea.
But, to clarify, I personally don't think Green isn't a cool color, I'm just wondering what the average moviegoer will think, and if it will be a factor at all. I mean, look at all the criticism the first Hulk movie got for the exact shade of green they used. People made similar comments about the first GL trailer, too.
Just trying to figure out what the general audience might think. Though, of ally concerns, the color is probably the least of them.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment