The Green Lantern Corps Message Board

Go Back   The Green Lantern Corps Message Board > Green Lanternverse > Hal Jordan & The Green Lantern Corps
FLASHCHAT

Hal Jordan and the Green Lantern Corps
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2018, 06:08 AM   #1
Ωmega Man
Guardian of the Universe
 
Ωmega Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East TN
Posts: 12,059
Blog Entries: 2
Thumbs up HJ & the GLC #42 (spoilers)



Darkstars Rising pt. 1

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I really enjoy how T. Tu has been developed lately. His interaction with the new Xudarian GL was needed and then the stuff with Tu and Hal was just a drastic turn. However it IS something I could see old friends disagreeing on. IDK where things are going to go with the new Darkstars but I dig them. Anything is better than another Corps wielding rings. Will they eventually be more heroic or will they be the anti-hero answer to the GLC now?

I've felt like Tu was getting lost in the background and I'm glad to see him get more development. However the way this particular story is starting out there are shades of the Rage of the Red Lanterns arc. Will any other familiar faces get Darkstar suits? Anybody from Earth gonna get one? WTF happened to Ferrin Colos? RIP Charlie Vicker.

John organizing the GL's throughout the universe looked like the GL playing marbles in zero gravity. Guy trying to stick his thumb up another guy's ass though is a bit much.

I hope DC has enough sense not to let Hank Henshaw take command of the robotic force like he has the Manhunters and the Alpha Lanterns. It seemed to me like the other six Controllers turned their backs on the one boasting about being so great... for a set-up issue I'd give it a 4/5.

- Ω
__________________
Ωmega Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 05:53 PM   #2
Star-Lantern
Hal's Understudy
 
Star-Lantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 506
Default

To me, there's no point in bringing back the Darkstars and ignoring just about everything about them. If there is no Merayne Dethalis in this storyline (I'm about 1000% certain there won't be), Ferrin Colos, or any worthwhile acknowledgment of John Stewart being their leader at one time (I'm growing more and more certain there will be none of that, either, since it should have happened during the last Controllers arc), I don't see the point. Perhaps I'm jumping the gun, though. I just don't have any faith in Venditti to actually use elements from Green Lantern's past to even decent effect.

I'm not saying a good story can't still be told, but if things turn out the way I think they will (and they probably will), I think this will be another example of why Venditti shouldn't be writing Green Lantern: No real appreciation of its history, an inability to successfully exploit that history, lack of success at creating new concepts (ex: Relic, Emotional Reservoir), and not a strong understanding of what fans like about GL and how to give it to them.

But at least previous arcs matter for this arc, and it looks like someone (Tomar-Tu) is actually getting character development!

Last edited by Star-Lantern; 04-14-2018 at 05:55 PM.
Star-Lantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 10:34 PM   #3
Space Cop
The Dandy
 
Space Cop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Third State
Posts: 25,199
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I thought Hal's comment that his home is beyond "an eye for an eye" was silly. I'll lay aside that it misses the point of the passage to boil it down to some kind of death-penalty revenge since Hal is not only not a theologian, but not even a church goer. However, even with this common understanding of the passage, it's a pretty pointless statement since the death penalty is not only common in his home country but the rule-of-the land for many other countries on his world.
__________________
Space Cop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2018, 10:37 PM   #4
Kane2814
Weaponer of Qward
 
Kane2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 760
Default

For what it's worth, I do think Venditti will mention John's former involvement with the Darkstars - Hal's last comment here makes me think there will at least be an acknowledgment. Whether or not this will still boil down to Hal taking them all on by himself and ending them because ... WILLPOWER, remains to be seen.
Kane2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2018, 02:37 PM   #5
Mister Ed
Horse of a Different Color
 
Mister Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 14,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane2814 View Post
For what it's worth, I do think Venditti will mention John's former involvement with the Darkstars - Hal's last comment here makes me think there will at least be an acknowledgment. Whether or not this will still boil down to Hal taking them all on by himself and ending them because ... WILLPOWER, remains to be seen.
Frankly, I hold very little hope for this arc. The Darkstars were never my favorite, and revisiting them NOW is just a recipe for another all-you-can-stomach buffet of retcons that will most likely just underline how lots of the stuff I LIKED from back in the day is no longer in continuity.
__________________
Mister Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2018, 01:13 PM   #6
Mister Ed
Horse of a Different Color
 
Mister Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 14,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space Cop View Post
I thought Hal's comment that his home is beyond "an eye for an eye" was silly. I'll lay aside that it misses the point of the passage to boil it down to some kind of death-penalty revenge since Hal is not only not a theologian, but not even a church goer. However, even with this common understanding of the passage, it's a pretty pointless statement since the death penalty is not only common in his home country but the rule-of-the land for many other countries on his world.
Yeah. When somebody in Star Trek says something like that, we can pretend that maybe in the far future that isn't a thing anymore, but for Hal to say it is just silly. (And yeah, the biblical principle was a LIMIT on retribution, not a "revenge" statement, basically saying that the penalty should not EXCEED the offense.)
__________________
Mister Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2018, 02:31 PM   #7
Space Cop
The Dandy
 
Space Cop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Third State
Posts: 25,199
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Ed View Post
Yeah. When somebody in Star Trek says something like that, we can pretend that maybe in the far future that isn't a thing anymore, but for Hal to say it is just silly. (And yeah, the biblical principle was a LIMIT on retribution, not a "revenge" statement, basically saying that the penalty should not EXCEED the offense.)
Exactly to both points. That particular proscription is meant to prevent a wronged party or the law from say killing someone because they had their tooth knocked out.
__________________
Space Cop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.