Possibly. Had a similar issue where I work, one elderly person would intentionally smear their turd in the bathroom sink and then put it in the trash can. Cleaning staff loathed restoring the room every time.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Weird News
Collapse
X
-
-
Villain Draft 3: Fourth Place Winner
September 11, 2001; January 6, 2021; February 13, 2021
Comment
-
I saw them pass over LA and counted 59 of them. I figured they were military jets.
https://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2021/02...9111613685872/
Comment
-
Coca cola is forcing employees to take a training course to be less white. Ps4 dosent allow me to post links but you can find still images of the training video through tweets . Good thing im a pepsi guy. Coca cola has always been trash as a drink.................................................. ..........................
Cnn = constant nasuating nonsense
Comment
-
I saw the screenshots. It really does seem problematic to me. I mean, the focus of the training seems to be to try to adjust people's attitudes in ways that are admirable (be less arrogant, be less oppressive, be less defensive, etc.), but where it becomes problematic, in my eyes, is where it links all these negative attributes as intrinsic to being white, so that it paints a thoroughly negative stereotype of white people, then says "be less white".
Now the difference, I suppose, is that as a white person, if I worked for a company that required that training, I don't think I would take it to heart, or feel truly threatened. I'd just roll my eyes and dismiss the training as thoroughly biased.
I expect that if there were ever a situation where employees were forced to take a training linking many negative traits to being black, and were told explicitly to "be less black" (I imagine that has been the case, though perhaps not so explicitly), THAT would feel a lot more threatening to the black people forced to undergo it, because society has not, historically, allowed them to simply shrug off that kind of nonsense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Ed View PostI saw the screenshots. It really does seem problematic to me. I mean, the focus of the training seems to be to try to adjust people's attitudes in ways that are admirable (be less arrogant, be less oppressive, be less defensive, etc.), but where it becomes problematic, in my eyes, is where it links all these negative attributes as intrinsic to being white, so that it paints a thoroughly negative stereotype of white people, then says "be less white".
Now the difference, I suppose, is that as a white person, if I worked for a company that required that training, I don't think I would take it to heart, or feel truly threatened. I'd just roll my eyes and dismiss the training as thoroughly biased.
I expect that if there were ever a situation where employees were forced to take a training linking many negative traits to being black, and were told explicitly to "be less black" (I imagine that has been the case, though perhaps not so explicitly), THAT would feel a lot more threatening to the black people forced to undergo it, because society has not, historically, allowed them to simply shrug off that kind of nonsense.Last edited by TazzMission; 02-23-2021, 06:08 PM................................................... ..........................
Cnn = constant nasuating nonsense
Comment
-
You have to be careful not to fall into the trap of using "There are far worse places" as justification for assuming what we have here is perfect, and we shouldn't address any problems.
Comparing oneself to Hitler always makes one look good by comparison, but I can't let the fact that I'm a better person than Hitler convince me that I don't need to improve anything about myself.
I'm not saying we need to uncritically accept any and all claims about how our country needs to do things differently (that wouldn't even be possible, since there are conflicting claims), but we also can't afford to fool ourselves into thinking our country has no problem because "just look at CHINA!".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Ed View PostYou have to be careful not to fall into the trap of using "There are far worse places" as justification for assuming what we have here is perfect, and we shouldn't address any problems.
".Last edited by TazzMission; 02-23-2021, 07:13 PM................................................... ..........................
Cnn = constant nasuating nonsense
Comment
-
I imagine many would argue that we aren't "the best" on human rights, even though we are clearly much better than many other places.
I'm not saying our country is horrible, but there is a sort of knee-jerk defensiveness we have to be wary of. Yes, some criticisms I hear seem unfair, and some "solutions" (abolish the police, really?) seem borderline crazy, but there is a real danger inherent in snapping back against ANY criticisms with a knee-jerk comparisons to places that are much worse.
People always seem to be willing to admit that we're "not perfect", but if that admission doesn't come with a willingness to at least consider proposed improvements, then it feels rather dishonest.
Like I said, I know some criticisms may seem unfair, but even in those cases it seems like it is important to try to have a dialogue, because it seems to me like, usually, even if you don't agree with their estimation of the extent of the problem, or the exact nature of it, if we're honest and willing to consider things, we find that there is SOME kind of problem at the root, and nothing is served by just defensively denying that, and pointing to China or Nazi Germany. Nothing will EVER improve that way, and if we truly believe our country isn't PERFECT, we should be looking for ways to improve it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Ed View PostI imagine many would argue that we aren't "the best" on human rights, even though we are clearly much better than many other places.
I'm not saying our country is horrible, but there is a sort of knee-jerk defensiveness we have to be wary of. Yes, some criticisms I hear seem unfair, and some "solutions" (abolish the police, really?) seem borderline crazy, but there is a real danger inherent in snapping back against ANY criticisms with a knee-jerk comparisons to places that are much worse.
People always seem to be willing to admit that we're "not perfect", but if that admission doesn't come with a willingness to at least consider proposed improvements, then it feels rather dishonest.
Like I said, I know some criticisms may seem unfair, but even in those cases it seems like it is important to try to have a dialogue, because it seems to me like, usually, even if you don't agree with their estimation of the extent of the problem, or the exact nature of it, if we're honest and willing to consider things, we find that there is SOME kind of problem at the root, and nothing is served by just defensively denying that, and pointing to China or Nazi Germany. Nothing will EVER improve that way, and if we truly believe our country isn't PERFECT, we should be looking for ways to improve it.
How would you define a perfect life , country or world?Last edited by TazzMission; 02-23-2021, 07:22 PM................................................... ..........................
Cnn = constant nasuating nonsense
Comment
-
The fact that we cannot realistically attain perfection doesn't mean we shouldn't be open to improvements. That's all I'm saying. Nothing is served by shutting down all criticism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Ed View PostThe fact that we cannot realistically attain perfection doesn't mean we shouldn't be open to improvements. That's all I'm saying. Nothing is served by shutting down all criticism.Last edited by TazzMission; 02-23-2021, 07:35 PM................................................... ..........................
Cnn = constant nasuating nonsense
Comment
-
Villain Draft 3: Fourth Place Winner
September 11, 2001; January 6, 2021; February 13, 2021
Comment
-
Comment
Comment