Tyson really wasn't wrong about this, although he picked a bad moment to say it. But I think it might be more to the point to say that we get more upset about an unusually high number of people getting killed in one event than we do about an equal or greater number getting killed in many separate events.
On an average day in the U.S., about 20 people are killed in gun homicides, and the general public doesn't get distraught about that. But we had two mass shootings this weekend in which 29 people were killed, and suddenly everyone is calling for action.
This psychology has a lot to do with how we define as news, which is something unusual that happens. We see an unusual event that's bad as much more significant than a usual event that's just as bad or worse, because the unusual event constitutes news. The usual event is not news, except locally.
We see 29 people getting killed in 29 different events as no big deal. But we see 29 people getting killed by guns in two events as world-altering.
https://deadline.com/2019/08/neil-de...hs-1202661285/
On an average day in the U.S., about 20 people are killed in gun homicides, and the general public doesn't get distraught about that. But we had two mass shootings this weekend in which 29 people were killed, and suddenly everyone is calling for action.
This psychology has a lot to do with how we define as news, which is something unusual that happens. We see an unusual event that's bad as much more significant than a usual event that's just as bad or worse, because the unusual event constitutes news. The usual event is not news, except locally.
We see 29 people getting killed in 29 different events as no big deal. But we see 29 people getting killed by guns in two events as world-altering.
https://deadline.com/2019/08/neil-de...hs-1202661285/
Comment